cadrumo.application.ledger.confirm_establishment module¶

Where the establishment ladder is actually reached: the confirm path.

The ladder, its four rungs, the identification and establishment split, the country vocabulary, the alpha-3 correspondence and the Spanish postal derivation were each built and each gated. None of them was called from a live path. This module is the call: it takes the document an operator is confirming and the direction they settled it under, resolves BOTH parties’ territories through the authorities that own them, and hands the answers to the criteria assembly in the one channel that carries who established what.

Two parties, two authorities, and they are not interchangeable. The filer’s own territory is a profile fact – system-authoritative, declared once, and identical whichever document is being confirmed – so it is read from the profile and never from the paper. Only the counterparty’s territory is a document question, and it is answered by the ladder. Resolving the filer from their printed address block would ask a probabilistic reader for something already known with certainty, and resolving the counterparty from the profile would answer a question about one entity with a fact about another.

Neither authority is doubled by the assembly. The criteria assembly can derive a scope from a printed country and postal code itself, and this module deliberately hands it NEITHER for the parties it has already resolved. A scope supplied as a declared fact and a scope re-derived from the same printed values are two answers to one question, and the second one is reached exactly when the first refused – so the duplication would not merely be redundant, it would resurrect every answer the ladder declined to give. The ladder’s refusals are the reason it exists.

An exhausted ladder yields no territory and says so. There is no branch here that answers without evidence. The peninsula is the majority population, so a default there is invisible in testing while silently placing Canarian and Ceutan counterparties inside a territory their operations are not subject to. What an exhausted ladder produces instead is a review item naming the counterparty, so the question reaches a person.

The review items are surfaced, not yet refused, and that is a stated interim. The fourth amendment’s design is one question per new counterparty whose paper is non-decisive, deduped by an operator answer persisted at counterparty level. The persisting verb has no operator-facing surface yet, so refusing here would make every domestic invoice permanently unconfirmable rather than asking once – a refusal nobody can answer is not a review gate. The items are therefore carried onto the confirmation result, where the review surface reads them, and the refusal follows the answer channel rather than preceding it.