cadrumo.core.register_scoping_signal module

Closed axis for what an offered option list SUGGESTS about its own scoping.

One enum, and every member name begins with a hedge on purpose. Whether the declaraciones register’s combobox option lists are scoped to the authenticated NIF or are a static universal catalogue cannot be settled without an authorised live probe against an account with real filing history. This enum does not settle it; it records what a free, offline comparison SUGGESTS, and it is deliberately incapable of expressing a resolved answer.

See RegisterScopingSignal.

class RegisterScopingSignal(*values)[source]

Bases: StrEnum

What an offered modelo set suggests about whether it is NIF-scoped.

There is deliberately NO UNIVERSAL and NO NIF_SCOPED member, and the absent pair is the point. A resolved member would let a heuristic reading be stored, exported and later cited as though a live probe had confirmed it — and the whole design rests on never making that claim. Every member is a hedge, so a consumer cannot accidentally render this as settled.

Nothing in the walk grid depends on this classification: the offered option set is unioned in additively regardless, so a reading here can never widen or narrow what is walked. It exists to tell an operator, and a future reviewer, which way the free evidence points.

Variables:

  • LIKELY_UNIVERSAL – The offered set includes modelos the taxpayer’s own declared facts positively EXCLUDE. A list scoped to this NIF would not offer a modelo the profile answers “no” for, so the list looks like a catalogue rendered regardless of taxpayer. This is the reading that matters most, because it is the one under which measuring coverage against the offered set alone would be meaningless.

  • LIKELY_NIF_SCOPED – The offered set includes NONE of the modelos the profile positively excludes. Consistent with a NIF-scoped list, but only consistent with it: a universal catalogue would produce the same observation for a taxpayer whose profile excludes nothing the register happens to list.

  • INCONCLUSIVE – The comparison cannot discriminate — there were no confidently-excluded modelos to look for, or no offered modelos to look in. Never a weak version of either reading above; it means the available evidence says nothing either way.

LIKELY_UNIVERSAL
LIKELY_NIF_SCOPED
INCONCLUSIVE